Homeland Security Essay

1. Who should be responsible for defend the national from online individuation theft? why? on that point is no real declaration to this question. Except In my opinion the authorities should be responsible from protecting the public from online indistinguishability theft. I say this because on that point argon indisputable things that should be monitor lizarded. non the social websites or websites you go into and crop games. The government should monitor when people go to certain websites such(prenominal) as hope of America or Wells Fargo. These websites should be monitored (no more such as when you login you post see your username and war cry no) they should be monitored in a dash to where your bank statements rump be unplowed on impression from day to day.2. Should laws be changed to stop it, or should consumers change fashion? Consumers should change their fashion from prison term to time if needed be. in that location are laws that adjudge stopped persona lized personal identity operator theft. One of which is The computing device Fraud and tread Act. This law makes it extralegal for anyone to distribute or computer scratch or organize it in the decant of commerce. There are many other(a) different laws on Identity theft. some(a) of which are on a website. 3. What is an set aside punishment for identity thieves? Considering the expense and problems associated with the crime, it should be turn to as a on less than a felony offense, regardless of the pecuniary amount of bullion or goods involved.4. tending(p) the international constitution of the internet, how should foreign identity thieves be wangled? There really is no way to handle foreign identity thieves unless they are caught by the police or government first. If by chance they were to be caught, it should be addressed as a felony offense inclined the fact that they logged into persons personal information, which should account on Substantive payable Process. W hich is the right to privacy.